Michael Steuer: Reflecting on my first two weeks as Casper Association CTO

Dear Casper Community:

As I write this, I’m approaching 2 weeks since my appointment as the new CTO for Casper Association. A few days ago, a community member asked me to outline what I’ve worked on these first 2 weeks, and what my impression of the project is as a result.

Not only is this a fair question, but indeed a good idea! So here goes.

First off, let me clearly state that I am part of an amazing team that is firing on all cylinders. While I’m happy to own any criticism, any and all successes are truly a team effort. Secondly, from Day 1 I have made my commitment to radical transparency and community participation crystal clear. At the same time, below I may refer to initiatives that are in progress, without giving away all details or naming counter-parties. When I don’t disclose those details, assume it is for two reasons only:

  1. I also committed to no more “over-promising and under-delivering”. As a community, you should be able to take information you get from the project, and me, to the proverbial bank. So I will not “pre-announce” partnerships or launches before I am 100% confident that they will happen.
  2. It is in the entire community’s benefit that any launch or partnership can be effectively marketed. This cannot be done if announcements are not properly timed, potential media are lined up, partners are coordinated and social channels are fully leveraged.

What have I been up to?

To say it’s been a whirlwind is probably an understatement. I’ve come in with very clear priorities that I’ve been laser focused on executing:

  1. Deliver the technology
  2. Enable mass market use cases on Casper Network
  3. Rebuild and activate the community
  4. Decentralized Governance

Most of what I’ve been focused on these past 2 weeks can be categorized into one or multiple of these buckets. In a response to the community’s request for transparency on my activity so far, below is a detailed accounting of much of it.

Deliver the technology

For better or worse, Casper core protocol development has been a responsibility shared between two entities, Casper Association and Casper Labs, for much of its history. Aspirationally, the Casper Association was always the guardian of the technology, the protocol and the public network, and Casper Labs, a for-profit enterprise-software company at its core, was a subcontractor to the Casper Association that provided much of the software development of the Casper protocol on a work-for-hire basis. In reality, much of the product strategy and execution was exclusively decided on the Casper Labs side of this equation, and because as a for-profit organization Casper Labs has to continuously weigh and balance its priorities, these priorities did not always match those of the Casper Association. To put things bluntly, a blockchain core development team can only function optimally when it’s pursuing a single unified goal - the best product-market-fit for its core blockchain technology in the broadest sense of the word. In a scenario where multiple goals are pursued, such as core protocol development AND multiple standalone enterprise projects, execution will inevitably suffer. Alongside my appointment as Casper Association’s new CTO, we announced that we have assumed the full responsibility for the development of Casper’s core technology going forward. This will now allow us to focus all efforts and resources on pursuing our holy grail - making Casper Network the most attractive blockchain technology for mass market use cases.

Much of my first two weeks involved work relating to this reorganization of resources, as well as implementing new and improved processes around product delivery. Below is a comprehensive list of activities in that area:

  • Personnel issues ((re)hiring, firing, transitioning personnel between entities, transitioning responsibilities between personnel, one-on-one meetings with much of the team, etc.)
  • Full day in-person meeting in California with Ed Hastings, the Head of Engineering of the Casper core development team
  • Meetings with the Project Management team regarding updated product development methodology, tooling, processes and reporting
  • Optimize new Daily Core Team stand-up meeting protocols
  • Review and determine scope of initial release of Condor (Casper 2.0.0)
  • Create policy around release-based versioning, semantic versioning, backlog management
  • Re-establish network testing program
  • Review/negotiate vendor agreements
  • Migrate DevOps responsibilities to new team members
  • Migrate JS SDK development responsibilities to new team members
  • Review and re-prioritize R&D team activities, including ZK and L2 related work
  • Focus Developer Relations efforts on completion of updated developer/operator documentation, Condor release notes and Condor overviews

Enable mass use cases on Casper Network

For much of the time since genesis, the sole focus of Casper Network was on enterprise use cases. While very valid and full of massive potential, the promise of blockchain extends well beyond enterprise applications only. We have a very solid technological foundation to support many more use cases, such as Decentralized Finance, gaming and tokenization, and have strong arguments to make about why we can be an attractive development target for those verticals. Leveraging our strong foundation and combining it with our ability to execute in an nimble and agile fashion, we also see opportunities to optimize host-side (native) functionality that further empowers specific use cases in the future. In the meantime, from Day One I started having in-depth conversations with all our current DeFi developers and projects, in order to ensure I understand their priorities, their challenges and their needs, with the intention of tackling their challenges and serving their needs as Casper Association CTO. I am also convening a DeFi Workgroup, in which I hope to bring together many of these parties, in order to jointly align on priorities as well as effective execution on the deliverables we collectively identify. Below is a high level overview of the types of conversations I’ve been having:

  • One of one conversations with current DeFi developers, bridges, swaps, exchanges and on-ramps
  • Conversations with new bridges yet to be announced
  • Conversations around L2 protocols
  • Kicked off the DeFi Workgroup project, assigned a dedicated project manager, and working on preparing the first meeting
  • Explore on-chain gaming initiative
  • Reviewed and revised the approach to Condor-support in our SDKs so that downstream impact is minimized

Rebuild and activate the Community

The success of a public, open-source, decentralized technology project is closely tied to the vibrancy of its community. Casper over the years has built a very impressive and loyal following, and at the same time we can do a whole lot better in the way that we engage with our community. This project belongs to ALL of us - whether one is a core-engineer, validator, app developer, or delegator - we collectively ensure the resiliency of the protocol, the impact of the technology and the public perception of this journey we’ve taken on together. This notion has not always been the guiding principle for Casper. My strong and unmovable belief is that it should and will be going forward. From day one, I have professed a spirit of radical transparency and a commitment to no “over-promising and under-delivering” - when you receive a communication from a formal source representing the project, you should be able to take it to the proverbial bank. It is in this spirit that I’ve started engaging with the community upon my appointment, and it is what I expect from all my co-workers. As I hope you can tell from my public conversations, I don’t shy away from tough questions, I welcome them - as long as we all have the best interest of our collective project in mind, divergent opinions and critical thought can only positively impact our outcomes. My community-related activities in the past 2 weeks have included:

  • An immediate open-ended, no holds barred AMA with the community on Telegram
  • Daily presence and participation in all public forums for Casper
  • The establishment of a Casper Governance Forum, where important topics, proposals and critical opinions can be aired, discussed and broad community consensus can be formed.
  • A review and revision of the formal community management guidelines
  • One of one meetings with many developers/projects in our ecosystem
  • Meeting with Casper’s early supporters (pre-mainnet)
  • The formation of a DeFi Workgroup, where all active stakeholders will collaboratively identify gaps in our ecosystem, and agree on how (and who is) to tackle them. A project manager has been assigned, and the date for a first gathering will soon be announced.
  • The establishment of a recurring Validator call, where Casper Validators can receive updates from, and directly interact with the core development team regarding the protocol, node operations and upcoming changes. The date for a first gathering will soon be announced.
  • Together with marketing and community management, established a predictable calendar for community events going forward (X space, DeFi calls, Validator calls), which will be published soon
  • With the help of the MAKE team, build and launch the official CSPR.fans Telegram App, which paired with an initial reward of 1MM CSPR to be allocated on Casper’s 6th birthday (October 31st, 2024), has breathed new life into our community. As I write this, the app has been live for 6 days, and here are some of the highlights:
    • Over 100,000 users in the app
    • Over 20,000 users who have connected their wallets
    • Our main Telegram group has grown by over 30%
    • Our X following has grown by many thousands
    • The ecosystem projects that have had rewarded tasks featured have collectively seen tens of thousands of new users/followers
    • On-chain tasks have started this week and are seeing good initial uptake
  • Preliminary indicators are that the community sentiment has taken a pretty rapid turn for the better, and we’re only just beginning.

Decentralized Governance

In as much as a decentralized blockchain project has to have a strong community, a community project cannot do without a good measure of decentralized governance. To date, the Casper project has been very centrally governed. History of the multiple core entities aside, it is one of my core principles coming into this role that we can and must do much better. First steps certainly include the measures already put into place the last couple weeks: the governance focused forum, the DeFi workgroup, the soon-to-be kicked-off recurring Validator calls, and the continuous feedback loop through active engagement with the Casper community. But none of that is true governance, in the sense that even with the best intentions, feedback/input via forums and chats are not binding on a legal entity such as the Casper Association. We are in the process of finalizing a plan that, when put in place, would set Casper on a path of true decentralized governance that will be highly innovative in the public layer-1 blockchain space. In this area, I have focused on the following:

  • Instituted the governance-focused forum
  • Finalized and published a proposal for new program parameters of the Incentivized Casper Testnet Program, which is now actively being discussed by the Testnet Validators on the forum.
  • Meetings with the Casper Association board, executives and Swiss legal advisors regarding the legal, regulatory and operational details and execution of the aforementioned decentralization plan.

Professional Reflection

In my years as a technology executive I have worked with many engineering teams and overseen hundreds of engineers. I can honestly say that the core engineering team at Casper is one of the most capable, most dedicated and most professional groups I have worked with over the past 3 decades. Given the chance to focus on execution and delivery, and within a framework that enables that, I have little doubt that this team can deliver on Casper’s ambitions as leading level 1 blockchain, and put in place the critical components and features that will enable the mass market use cases we as a collective (you, me, the team, the community) are after.

Overall, the entire team is unified in its sense of purpose, and welcomes any changes I have proposed to the way we do things (and, thankfully and very importantly, also tells me when they don’t!). Similarly, our dedicated ecosystem partners have been amazing, and the sense of renewed excitement amongst them is palpable.

We have big ambitions, and we realize that we have to regain trust and prove ourselves, and we are stoked and driven to deliver!

Personal Reflection

As many may know or could have deduced from my social presence - I am Jewish. The fifteen million Jews around the world celebrate the Jewish New Year this Thursday and Friday (I will be off and away from my keyboard :slightly_smiling_face:). Traditionally, the Jewish New Year is a time of reflection on the year past, a time of introspection on decisions and actions we have taken the previous year, and a time of renewal, of new chances. I see many parallels between this, and where we are in the Casper project. We are at an inflection point. A time of introspection, but most definitely, a time of renewal and new beginnings. The past is there to learn from, the future is ours to shape. On a personal level I am massively driven to contribute my part in making the next year of this project one to reflect on with pride, accomplishment and gratitude this time next year. I am grateful to all of you for being part of this collective journey.

Looking forward to hearing from you all! And to those who also celebrate: Happy New Year!

Michael.

PS. With thanks to LANCE :100: for the inspiration to share this reflection.

13 Likes

Generally thank you for writing this summary and overview.

There are many good things in it like that you’re available to the community and not ducking away from (most) questions which is a big thing for sure and the network was lacking “forever”.

Talking about full transparency doesn’t make sense to me though because of various reasons.

Casper Hack in July 2024 and Modifying Wallet Balances
I think there was still no full explanation what happened and which consequences it had. Instead validators were suddenly surprised with a binary update and out of nowhere a (for me existing but undocumented) feature was introduced:
Global State Fiddle

The binary update modified a lot of wallets/balances which were affected by the hack but I still never saw a public explanation about the impact - did I miss that or does it simply not exist?

Buzzwords - again! No roadmap - again!
Generally IMO so far it’s full of buzzwords and no concrete (public) plans, comparisons to other projects, what to expect from Condor, what to expect from the whole project and so on.

Casper Labs - from core developers to a 3rd party
You’re talking about Casper Labs like it is a 3rd party. While legally this is probably true and constructed by lawyers that way but → aren’t you, Mrinal, Medha and I think a few others the CoFounders of Casper Labs and therefore the whole network, project, community incl. the Casper Association (CA)?

Mrinal is dead silent, Medha left quietly and suddenly you are back as a CTO of CA? What happened to ~3.5 years of development after the MainNet launch in March 2021, all the money paid to CL, all the hype about enterprise adoption, ProveAI, projects which CL is working with which have more daily users than the whole Ethereum network (I think Medha mentioned that at least once), huge public sale and marketing on CoinList, all the “I think the people do misunderstand this and that about blockchain and this industry” from Mrinal in various interviews?

Are you taking advantage of the Stockholm Syndrome and do you hope that the “OGs” (who helped to build and/or keep together what exists) will simply forget and that there will be enough people left who will join anyway if you feed them some free CSPR via an airdrop or connect them to other projects to earn one way or the other?

If I understand it correctly you are part of Casper since the beginning and that means for me ~6 years:
Were aware of all of that and watched it the whole time? Why didn’t you intervene earlier, didn’t stand up, didn’t raise your voice? Instead you decided to build all kind of tools for Casper with MAKE and most probably not for free and basically a monopoly. I know a lot is open source but w both know that this doesn’t mean a lot if you can be sure that nobody else will join and build more on an unattractive ecosystem like Casper. Also the DEVxDAO thing (which many think was a money laundering scheme and was abused by participants) - you/MAKE have been a very active (paid) participant of the DEVxDAO as well, weren’t you?

Transfer of millions of CSPR to exchanges
What happened here and why were so many CSPR transferred to different exchanges? You’ve mentioned the Ethereum Foundation did some big transfers as well (~$94M IIRC) - yes, they did, but ~1 week later they explained why and what for. Also they have a very real and existing ecosystem, many projects, users, staff etc. So please compare this with what the Ethereum Foundation did.

Another project of yours: https://ale.network
I came also across the https://ale.network which you are a CoFounder again together with Alex Kelly (who is also a CoFounder of MAKE where you are a CoFounder as well) and Wulf Kaal. Didn’t Wulf Kaal design the whole DEVxDAO thing which failed miserably already?

CSPR.fans - AirDrops?!*
I’m sure that you are ware that the numbers you provided are pretty useless without putting them into context.

Eg it is true that ~15k new users joined the official Telegram group BUT first that shows that there have been ~27k people only before. Second I didn’t see 1 single message or user who wanted to do something useul. Instead the questions are about when the free CSPR will be received and what they have to do. What I mean: you attract airdrop farmers - but not people who are interested to build on Casper or contribute in a positive way. I also remember that the highest number of users I’ve seen was during the Bitrue wallet (IIRC) which also gave I think 10 CSPR to everyone. The group grew to ~55k members, dropped to ~27k (50%!!!) and in the end Bitrue and other wallet providers and products abandoned Casper.

Why did you decide to go that route? Also why wit this small micro amount of 1M CSPR? IIRC this was worth 12,400 USD at the launch of CSPR.fans → over 100,000 users have to share this tiny price pool.

So growth of 30% sounds nice but it’s clearly not IMO.

For reference here some Telegram stats as well:

I could go on and on but I know that the past can’t be changed, only the future can be shaped BUT:
The past can be explained in an honest and transparent why. Therefore a few direct questions to you:

  • Why did you watch ~6 years what is happening without doing anything except - and this is how it looks to me - happily profiting from running MAKE, participating in DEVxDAO, starting another ale.network with Wulf Kaal, being somehow involved in BOINKERS if I’m not mistaken…?
  • Do you expect that everyone who spent their life-time with this project to simply forget the core principles which this network was built on: enterprise focus, sustainable blockchain-based products instead of “monkey pictures”?
  • When will there be a clear roadmap what the roadmap of Casper will be?
  • Are you trying to convince people now to build another hype-chasing chain and trying to be faster and better at marketing than competitors to catch gold diggers and happily selling them shovels?
  • When will you finally release a list of the “vibrant ecosystem”? Who is actively building on Casper and will be available after Condor? What I see is that more and more projects, genesis validators, projects, core developers and team members are leaving. The only thing which was added are 100,000 airdrop farmers which will do the math at some point as well and realize that they’re competing for 1M CSPR at a current value of $0.0122 ($12,200) as you can see here:
  • Why do you try to attract new users with this AirDrop instead of building stronger connections with existing projects? You’ve accomplished that various projects and individuals left the project, stopped all operations and/or moved to another chain.

In other words (and this is not an accusation but my impression and conclusion after all that time and all the things I’ve seen, heard, experienced myself over the years):
It looks to me that you found some clever ways on how to milk the system in a legal way and you’re not interested in building something useful for the users but that your goal is to generate profits from this. Nothing wrong with making profits but if you’re misleading people and selling them shovels this should just stop and not continue.

So if it fails - who cares, you got paid already and therefore you can also happily move on to the next project, network, position with your colleagues and CoFounders and pretend that the future will be better and let’s not focus on the past but shape the future.

3 Likes

I completely agree with Stakepire, and I hope all questions will be answered in the most honest way possible and with full transparency. I also agree that Casper Fan was not the best idea; often, such apps attract bots or users for very short periods. Recently, I have seen many people inquire about CasperPunk, and you have yet to respond. I would also like to know what happened to CasperPunk.

I am not an investor in Ghost Picture, but it is important to note that the leader of Casper Punk is Steve Careaga, who is also the CFO, a member of the Board of Advisors, and the co-founder of Casper Labs. Additionally, he is the Director of Strategic Relationships at Casper Association. He is not just an ordinary person who can develop projects like CasperPad, The Swappery, Skybridge, and Kunft and then disappear with investors’ money.

After nearly 10,000 NFTs were sold at around $120 each, the development of CasperPunk has stopped. You cannot even interact with the NFTs anymore. I am a proud owner of a Gen0 NFT that was airdropped to me at the very beginning, but now we can’t do nothing because the CasperPunk marketplace is no longer functioning, and no one has replied on their Discord for months.

What is most concerning is that a person like Steve Careaga, who leads Casper Association and Casper Labs, left with nearly $1 million from NFT sales without a word or any communication. In my opinion, there is something shady behind all of this. So Michael, if you could shed some light on the situation, that would be greatly appreciated. Casper Fan is not enough; I have been here since the first round of the ICO on CoinList (which was also poorly managed, by the way), but we are still here, and I believe we deserve answers.

2 Likes

Hi @Stakepire -

Thank you for taking so much time and putting so much effort into parsing my update and providing your “review” and gap analysis. Let me address your questions/comments:

The details of the hack were explained here.

The global state update tool has existed and was previously used on Testnet during an update 1-2 years ago.

The full Casper-1.5.7 update is of course public and available here on GitHub.

The input file that was used for the rewrite can be found here.

I’m not sure what you mean by buzzwords, to be honest, and suspect it may just be a difference in communication style. As to roadmap, I have mentioned this before, publicly, so will do it here again (again!):

  • We have finalized the scope for RC5, which we hope to be our final release candidate.
  • Everything outside of that scope is currently backlogged without a release assigned to it
  • Post Condor-release, which will be Casper 2.0.0, we are switching back to regular semantic versioning
  • From a roadmap perspective, this means we will now be able to take our backlog and map each feature/change to a specific release. This process will really commence post RC5, since that’s the current focus
  • We had to do significant “forensic” work to account for all the changes that have gone into Condor to date, because tracking was done in multiple places, and now have a good handle on the changelog. Our DevRel team is working on making that presentable.
  • Similarly we had to do some work to ensure that the scope for RC5/Condor was locked down, since not all issues had properly been assigned a release. This work completed.
  • We moved to having a single source of truth for workflow management, ZenHub on top of GitHub. This means that GitHub Issues is the underlying data storage. If you take a look there now, you can see all issues that are in RC5, and if you disable that label, you will see the entire backlog. We are working on a public view on top of this that will make this more easily consumable for laypeople such as yourself.

OK - a lot to unpack here. I’ll do it in bullets, so you can perhaps understand it more easily:

  • Casper Labs and Casper Association are separate entities. Always have been. When I speak on behalf of Casper Association, I’m not speaking on behalf of Casper Labs
  • Yes, I am one of the 5 co-founders of Casper Labs, back in 2018. So was Mrinal. Medha was not, we recruited her from a company called Pyrofex where she had gained experience working on another implementation of Casper CBC consensus.
  • I left my executive role at Casper Labs in April 2019 (or more accurately, the parent holding at the time), and have had no other formal role in the Casper Ecosystem since, other than being a common shareholder in Casper Labs Holding AG, and an outside contributor to the ecosystem with MAKE
  • I’m not going to opine about quotes from others. You can ask me about things I say and do.
  • I take real offense with you “are you taking advantage” line of arguing. I have not, ever, done anything to give you the idea that I am not sincere.
  • You are alleging I didn’t say or do anything for 6 years, but you don’t actually know that. My only available tools were two-fold: 1) use my shares to vote in shareholder votes of Casper Labs, and 2) give my strongly worded opinions to the management of CA and CL. I have used both.
  • “I decided to build all kinds of tools for Casper with MAKE” for the same reason I do anything for Casper - because I am motivated by the success of the project, and will try to fill any gaps I identify, either officially or unofficially. You’re right, it wasn’t for free. If you have to know, MAKE (ie. my and Alex’s personal pockets) have subsidized this ecosystem to the tune of several million dollars.
  • Yes, I was a member of the Developer DAO, where my main objective too was to ensure its activities inured to maximum benefit of Casper. You are again making unfounded personal accusation that I take strong offense to. Are you calling me a money launderer or an abuser? Or both? “Many people think…” is not a sincere way or arguing in presidential politics, nor in this forum.

You’re talking about the Casper Association? Like the Ethereum Foundation and other projects, it has annual budgets, employees, grantees, contractors, taxes/licenses, and many other expenses. As well as a responsibility to manage it’s treasury responsibly, ie. not having all value locked in a single asset, in order to guarantee the long term sustainability of the project.

I’m not sure what the question is here? If your problem here is that I’m involved in one other project, then I have to sorely disappoint you, and you’re really going to hate this then, but I am actually a direct shareholder in dozens of projects, and indirect (through VC funds etc) in hundreds. Including many in the blockchain space. Do you want to go over each of them individually?

Thanks for sharing your opinion on the Telegram App. Let’s agree to disagree here.

  • Not profiting, but subsidizing by millions
  • Yes, I am involved in other projects. Dozens of them.

I don’t expect anyone to “simply forget” anything. But being rigid doesn’t benefit anyone either. Nokia was an army boots manufacturer before they became a mobile technology company. IBM made punchcard machines, and now they’re exclusively a consulting company. Companies and projects (and people) make changes over time in response to changing conditions, opportunities and hindsight.

Detailed process addressed above.

Notwithstanding the patronizing and insulting tone to both me and the broader community: no.

We expect to kick off our first DeFi Workgroup call in the next couple weeks, and either the recording or a summary will be published.

I am constant contact with existing projects. Again, you’re making allegations that are not grounded in fact.

For “not an accusation” it sure sounds very accusatory. You clearly don’t know me, or anything I’ve done in the past. Prior to co-founding MAKE (and Casper Labs two years later), I have been a well-respected founder and technology executive in various industries for 25+ years, and have a provable track record of delivering value and execution from the forefront of innovation. In the late nineties, I oversaw the establishment of an interoperable Premium SMS network across Europe and North America, connecting over 100 mobile network operators in order to enable use cases that persist until today. In the early 2000s, I was the CTO for Mobile for THQ, a top-3 video game publisher at the time, and oversaw the team that created the first downloadable mobile games, heralding in the age of mobile gaming and the subsequent app-economy. Subsequently, I oversaw the roll out of the first mobile-skill gaming platform in North America and Europe, which became a category-defining genre of video gaming. During the 2010s, I was the CTO of Playsino, a leading social and mobile casino game publisher that serviced tens of millions of players worldwide. Active in the blockchain industry since 2013, I have been involved with many of the early players in our industry in various capacities. With MAKE, my team and I developed public health technology platforms that are in use by 80% of the top pharmaceutical companies worldwide, and during the COVID-19 pandemic, helped governments on the national, state and local level manage their pandemic response. Throughout it all, I have built and developed highly-functional teams, and provided them with the tools and structures to execute and deliver advanced products on a consistent basis. Finally, I have been an open-source contributor since the late nineties. There is nothing in my personal or professional history that would give rise to any of your “impressions”.

While I appreciate any and all constructive community engagement, “constructive” is the key word… Your engagement for many months now has been exclusively negative and basically “destructive”. And with some of the personal accusations you are making in this post, you are certainly crossing a red line for me. If you want to continue to engage in a respectful and constructive way, feel free to. Otherwise I suggest you might find more receptive ears in other, less civil environments.

Thanks,

Michael.

3 Likes

Hi @Gael ,

Thanks for engaging with me on this thread! Regarding your questions about Casper Punks:

I have reached out to Steve Careaga and was assured that the project will address these questions.

Just some fact clarifications:
Steve is indeed a fellow co-founder of Casper Labs, who also left the company in April of 2019, just like me. Most recently he was an employee at the Casper Association. He is not the CFO nor a board member of either organization. Casper Punks is a project by Punk Games Pty Ltd. in Singapore.

Nobody said it was? If anything, I said we’re just getting started with renewed community engagement, new outreach avenues, and a rapidly accelerating DeFi offering (alongside the delivery of the core tech).

2 Likes

Hi @michaelsteuer ,

first of all, thank you very much for bringing this new offensive in terms of community engagement! I do absolutely think this is the right way going forward and I think you’re doing a great job so far. After reading this thread I also understood that this might not be easy at times and you will most likely receive one or the other more accusation, but I do hope that you will stick to the path of transparency and community engagement, this would of course be highly appreciated and I think very beneficial to everything around CSPR.

We have held CSPR since the ICO and therefore stayed with CSPR since a long time, also with a major part of our investments in crypto.

Something we understood in the beginning, but began to doubt later on, is the strategy of the CSPR management to focus on «adoption» first and on developing CSPR in terms of value of the token later. We’ve observed CSPR going from top 100 CMC to 150 to top 100 to 150 again – now we ended up basically almost out of the top 300 with a very low 24h volume. In crypto terms, this is unfortunately close to irrelevance.

At the beginning, we thought CSPR to have a technological advantage (judging by the whitepaper and available information), with the management seemingly playing the long game to develop a robust technology with actual use casec contrary to what was and is going on in the crypto world. Unfortunately, now the vision of a token with broad industry adoption seemed to have failed by everything we can see and also in terms of trading volume. Moreover, CSPR has yet to be listed on Binance as the major exchange and is not as known in the crypto space as it should be.

We would be happy to get your thoughts on the following questions. We are aware that you are the CTO of the CA and not CL, but maybe you can comment anyway with your opinion on all of the below questions, or in some form make it possible that somebody from CL team will answer the questions on their behalf in case you cannot provide answers.

  • What is your plan to finally get more price action and volume for CSPR? If we drop out of the top300/350, likely nobody will believe anymore in CSPR and the project is in real risk of dying. We assume that is also why there are so many changes in personnel right now. Can we trust in the fact that you will drive change in this regard?

  • Can we expect CSPR to be listed on Binance in the near future or ever? Did this not happen because the CSPR management did not really focus on it, or does Binance actually not want to list CSPR for some reason? If Binance does not, are you aware of the reason for that?

  • There are rumors that Prove AI is being sold or in some other way moving away from CSPR. Is there any truth to this?

  • Is the integration of Prove AI into IBMs tools real and confirmed happening, and if yes, will this drive real volume and adoption to CSPR? On the Prove AI site is says Prove AI is * designed * to work seamlessly with IBM’s watsonx.governance suite, however earlier it was said and also confirmed by Mrinal in an interview that Prove AI is going to be integrated into the IBM toolsuite as a fixed part of their tooling – this was claimed to be confirmed via contract, while «designed to work» doesn’t really sound like it is an actual part of IBM software, more like an addon provided and sold only via CL.

  • Can we expect concrete and definite industry projects in the near future that will drive real adoption of CSPR and its token value?

Thank you for taking the time to respond!

All the best,
Josh

2 Likes

I have seen many people discussing rebranding, and I believe it could be important for the future of Casper. First, in my opinion, I preferred the original logo, even though it wasn’t the best. The red square “C” inside a circle is unappealing. You’ve mentioned that you’ll engage with your community, so why not conduct a poll to let them decide if they want a rebranding? I truly think it’s necessary. Today, LeeTheCaptain talked about this in his latest video. Please, @michaelsteuer , take a look: What’s Next for Casper? Could a Rebrand Be a Good Idea? Lee the Captain

4 Likes

Apparently, transparency is not very transparent.

2 Likes

This is great and I hope it will be more than dogs

1 Like

Hi Gael - what are you looking for more transparency on? Ask me anything.

1 Like

Hi @michaelsteuer, Gael was actually referring to you not answering the post/questions I posted earlier, which you may have overlooked in the time before.

As some of my questions are not up to date and have been answered already by the actions of CL and your available interviews, let me rephrase:

What is your plan to finally get more price action and volume for CSPR? We already dropped out of the top 400 MC for a bit, and the project will be in real danger of failing in case the token essentially becomes invisible to the market. We assume this risk is part of the reason for the personnel changes that were taken w.r.t. CA and CL.

More specifically, can we trust that you are fully committed to driving change in this regard, especially now that we are in the next bull run? This is an urgent opportunity for CSPR to capitalize on, and we need to ensure that CSPR profits from this market surge. Are you really pushing forward e.g. with initiatives like the Binance listing to make sure we don’t miss this critical moment? We think it would be really important to get another major listing soon, as this could bring the urgently needed price action during the bullrun.

More concretely w.r.t. Binance, can we expect CSPR to be listed on Binance in the near future, in case Binance doesn’t actively decline your request for listing?

Did the Binance listing not happen because CL management did not prioritize it, or does Binance have reasons for not listing CSPR? If Binance has declined, are you aware of the reasons for that, and is there a plan to address them?

Can we expect concrete and definitive industry/finance projects in the near future that will drive real adoption of CSPR and increase its token value?

Additionally, do you have sufficient funding for the upcoming years? A lot of funds were burned by CA without delivering significant benefits for the CSPR token, if we are honest here. You also have said that the priority to develop the CSPR protocoll was too low in the past and we have catching up to do. Are you confident the funding will be sufficient to catch up in terms of developing the technology as well as increasing the popularity of CSPR?

Thank you for taking the time to respond!

All the best,

Josh

1 Like

Hello mate, I hope you have been following the price action the last few days because Casper is now back in the top 300 on CMC, also hope you have noticed the recap of the DeFi working group (https://www.casper.network/news/recap-defi-working-group-call-nov-2024) as that answers where we are in terms of projects that are coming up like RWY protocol, Router protocol, COWL Network, and more recently after this DeFi working group the project Casper AI Agents has announced their launch on Casper.

Every question about listings will get the same response: there is a listing team at Casper, they listed Casper at big exchanges (Bitvavo, Bitstamp, Bybit) this year, always looking for opportunities to list on more exchanges including Binance / Coinbase but are not allowed to speak about future listings for obvious reasons.

Hope you find this information useful!

2 Likes

As you might already know or be aware, I cannot comment on price action nor make promises of specific exchange listings, as those are at the sole discretion of the respective exchange(s).

2 Likes